But frankly I am much more trusting in the quality of JRiver's audio manipulations than that of assorted other tools. I know there are VST plugins available that do these sorts of things. See further explanation in my later post below. These additional instances should be loadable by a per-track feature. Why? To facilitate per-track EQ adjustments (auto-eq). Allow an additional instance of the graphic equalizer, and another additional instance of the PEQ. In this regard, the configuration of the shelf filter is poorly implemented, and needs correction.Ĥ. Not only is it confusing to require S when requesting Q, but the validation (max 5) severely limits the slope you can use. The Q instead of S GUI error for shelf filters should be fixed. Perhaps even, dare I say it, the ability to change freq, boost/cut, and Q by manipulating graphical elements? There are external tools to model PEQ curves, but having to do the work twice to key it into MC is a drag.ģ. When making frequency adjustments it would be fantastically useful if it provided a visualization for the curve for each band, as well as for the overall resultant curve. The Parametric EQ badly needs some UI usability enhancements. The 12/14/16k bands are too close together for their Q values and are essentially redundant.Ģ. Likewise, a 5dB boost 16 yields a 3.5dB boost on the 12kHz sine wave. A 5dB boost at 14k yields a 4dB boost on a 12kHz sine wave. For example, there is too much overlap in the HF bands (12/14/16k). See point 2.) Also, the combination of band centers and Q's needs to be revised, as the current combination is inappropriate. Having only 4 bands below 1kHz is very limiting. Increase the number of bands on the graphic EQ. It would really be helpful if there could be a couple of improvements to the EQ functionality in MC.ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |